APRIL 6, 2016
By Ross Tillman, P.E., Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Have you ever driven through an intersection and wondered, “Am I lost?” Signing and roadway design may have forced you to drive “out of your way” to make your desired turn. You may have even found yourself asking the question, “Was I just driving on the wrong side of the road?” If any of these thoughts has ever crossed your mind, you likely encountered one of many different types of reduced conflict intersections.
What is a reduced conflict intersection? As the name implies, these designs reduce the number of conflict points, or locations where vehicles are exposed to potential collision with another vehicle or pedestrian. The reduction in conflict points is intended to increase safety by preventing certain crash-prone movements from occurring at the main intersection. These movements are thereby converted into movements less likely to result in a crash. Some designs attain a similar safety benefit by shifting traffic making higher risk maneuvers (i.e. left turns) to locations with less conflicting traffic.
There are many varieties of reduced conflict intersections and interchanges, from simple right-in/right-out intersections to complex interchanges. The Federal Highway Administration discusses six in the report titled, Alternative Intersections/Interchanges: Informational Report (AIIR).
Intersections:
Interchanges:
Each of these designs -- whether for an intersection or interchange -- is meant to either reduce conflict points or displace riskier movements to lower volume locations. Additionally, these treatments often result in reducing traffic signal phasing complexity by removing some or all of the protected left-turn phases from the main intersection.
A local example is the intersection of TH 169 and CSAH 28 in the City of Le Sueur. The intersection was recently converted to a Restricted Crossing U-Turn (RCUT) intersection in 2015. The area adjacent to the intersection was planned for development including commercial, industrial, and residential land uses. Rather than construct an interchange, the project team determined an RCUT could be utilized as a lower-cost solution to provide safety and traffic operations benefits while preserving previous investments made along TH 169.
Reduced conflict intersections come in many shapes and sizes, and therefore are able to “fit” a wide array of locations, project types, and funding sources. These intersections are tools every transportation professional should add to their toolbox.
March 25, 2024
March 25, 2024
February 23, 2024
APWA-MN Chapter, PO Box 46266, Eden Prairie, MN 55344-9712 | 1-888-407-2650 | Copyright © 2024 | Privacy Policy | Site Credits | Site Map |